Please change the 2.4.0 input field's resize behaviour

[Kevin Stange]

Mark Scott wrote:
> Kevin Stange wrote:
> 
>> Mark Scott wrote:
>>  I would wager that most Pidgin users don't keep their IM windows this 
>> large most of the time.  A lot of the changes in this vein were 
>> motivated by the idea of making the conversation work better at 
>> smaller sizes and may have failed to consider users that have 
>> extremely large windows.
> 
> Genuine interest: you consider ~800x100 to be extremely large?  It feels 
> just right to me :-S
> 

I do, but that doesn't mean I'm representative of the majority.  My IM 
window is smaller than 640x480.  About 13 lines of scrollback with a 2 
line entry area is what I have always used, so these changes basically 
had no impact on my usage.

Kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/support/attachments/20080303/cfacf647/attachment.sig>