[Pidgin] #4986: automatic chat input field resizing should be optional, regression from 2.3
Pidgin
trac at pidgin.im
Thu Apr 3 21:48:30 EDT 2008
#4986: automatic chat input field resizing should be optional, regression from 2.3
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: swbrown | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: pidgin (gtk) | Version: 2.4.0
Resolution: | Keywords: chat input resize
Pending: 0 |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by dbeusee):
Replying to [comment:218 mortan]:
> ...
Very nicely said, but I think all our comments have fallen on deaf ears,
or should I say, non-caring and non-compromising developers. [comment:222
sim-on] has re-enforced their non-caring/non-compromising nature in his
latest reply:
Replying to [comment:222 sim-on]
>'''1. There is a Plugin (#5296) and another pidgin-Version called
"[http://sf.net/projects/funpidgin/ funpidgin]" where auto-resizing is
disabled. And you are free to use them or reinstall
[http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=235&package_id=230234&release_id=559922
2.3.1].'''
Still "our way or the highway", it seems. This what you call
"compromising"?? This is what you call "we care"??
We want manual resize built-in the base program that is easy to activate
(by default ideally, or at least a very easy to find option - ideally
right there on the conversation window) and provided for out-of-the-box
(on install of pidgin - not via additional download and install, not by
recompiling, etc).
If we didn't mind relying on a fork like
[http://sf.net/projects/funpidgin/ funpidgin] just for this little, but
basic UI functionality, we would not need to keep arguing with you guys
here. I am using funpidgin, but I shouldn't have to. We are still
waiting for YOUR compromise (a plugin - whether installed with pidgin or
not, a fork, a "bug-fixed" auto-resize, a previous version... are not
compromises). We want manual, you want auto. Can we meet in the middle
via an OPTION? PLEASE? Can you guys just show a LITTLE flexibility?
Replying to [comment:212 ccb]:
>
> The FunPidgin link came up empty...
Get it here:
http://sf.net/projects/funpidgin/
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/4986#comment:225>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
More information about the Tracker
mailing list