[Pidgin] #9267: Log window inconvenience - dialog
Pidgin
trac at pidgin.im
Mon Jun 1 16:16:03 EDT 2009
#9267: Log window inconvenience - dialog
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jankratochvil | Owner: deryni
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Milestone: | Component: pidgin (gtk)
Version: 2.5.6 | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Changes (by deryni):
* owner: => deryni
Comment:
I read the EWMH the other direction, non-specified windows that are
transient to some other window should be treated similarly to _TYPE_DIALOG
windows (specifically to avoid them being treated as any other window
type, like _UTILITY, I'd imagine), but _TYPE_DIALOG windows need not be
transient to anything.
You cannot be 'in a "transient-for" relationship' without a parent window,
not meaningfully at least (I'm ignoring any potential application
transience/modality here). Further, the EWMH suggests (as an
implementation note) that "Windows that are transient for another window
should be kept above this window" but makes no such claim about
_TYPE_DIALOG windows and does not place them anywhere explicit in the
stacking order.
I'm not sure I agree with the handling of _TYPE_DIALOG in metacity and
xfwm (even less so in the non-transient case), but I haven't thought about
it enough (or know enough of the implementation details) to have an actual
opinion at the moment, nor do I care much.
The issue at hand is whether the "Conversations with ..." windows are
'dialogs' or not, if they are then we are doing things exactly as we
should be, and your dislike of your environments handling of such windows
is unfortunate but not our problem.
If, on the other hand, they should not be considered 'dialogs' then we
likely should not be (ab)using gtk_dialog_new_with_buttons to create them
and regardless of that should not be setting them as _TYPE_DIALOG (which
may mean overriding the type setting that the gtk_dialog_* functions do
automatically).
Keeping in mind my caveats before about my lack of fully considered
opinion on this, I would suggest that the (apparent) policy of keeping all
_TYPE_DIALOG windows above all windows (either of all applications or only
of the parent application) regardless of actual transience marking is a
poor policy and the cause of the problems here.
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/9267#comment:4>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
More information about the Tracker
mailing list