[Pidgin] #12218: [PATCH] Windows build unix-style
Pidgin
trac at pidgin.im
Tue Jun 22 09:40:38 EDT 2010
#12218: [PATCH] Windows build unix-style
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: pier11 | Owner: rekkanoryo
Type: patch | Status: new
Component: unclassified | Version: 2.7.1
Keywords: Windows build unix-style |
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Hi Pidgin team,
I'm submitting patch to make Windows build/installation to be in line with
traditional Unix-like ones.
I.e. use auto-tools for build and regular File Hierarchy System layout
(FHS) - i.e. /bin /lib /share etc.
The patch doesn't interfere with traditional windows build practice, but
adds an alternative.
The need in such build method is to use Pidgin in ecosystem of other open
source applications (like Evolution, GIMP, Inkscape) in windows software
collections/distributions like
[https://build.opensuse.org/project/show?project=windows%3Amingw%3Awin32
windows:mingw:win32] project on OBS (openSUSE Build Service) or
[https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/takeoffgw/index.php?title=Main_Page
TakeoffGW]. Those systems are closer to "normal" unix systems, utilize
common to unix directory layout and ship with auto-tools. I think it'll be
beneficial for Cygwin project as well.
Also resulting libraries contain proper headers and pkg-config files, so
it simplifies development of Pidgin plugins.
I've created
'''[https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=mingw32-pidgin&project=home%3Apier11%3Amingw%3Awin32
mingw32-pidgin]''' and
'''[https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=mingw64-pidgin&project=home%3Apier11%3Amingw%3Awin64
mingw64-pidgin]''' pilot packages in my home project on OBS and intend to
propose them to windows:mingw:win32 (:win64) projects.
[[BR]]
[[BR]]
''Notes on patch:''
1. Since Windows platform needs ''-no-undefined'' symbols when creating
dlls, it was required to build for example core libs first (like libpurple
and libpidgin) and only then build plugins. For this same reason libpurple
had emerged (the same as in existing Windows build).
2. Libtool is specific beast. For lib (dll) to be installed to /bin
directory (a normal Windows practice), the lib should not be a ''-module''
and have ''lib'' prefix. Hence ''libpidgin.dll'' (not ''pidgin.dll''). The
rest of namings matches to ones in existing Windows build.
3. I had to install pidgin plugins to ''purple-2'' directory, since the
current windows code doesn't make difference between install directories
of pidgin and purple plugins. So just to not alter Pidgin code much
initially.
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/12218>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
More information about the Tracker
mailing list