Final draft of logo is in
craesh at craesh.net
Thu Apr 26 10:53:40 EDT 2007
Quoting Colin Barrett <timber at lava.net>:
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 6:41 AM, Ethan Blanton wrote:
>> Sean Egan spake unto us the following wisdom:
>>> On 4/24/07, Mark Doliner <mark at kingant.net> wrote:
>>>> I like it. Could we cut out little holes in the middle of the p,
>>>> the d and
>>>> the g? I'm afraid the text isn't immediately recognizable as
>>>> "pidgin" the way
>>>> it is now.
>>> I disagree ;) The text has been my favorite part of the logo since we
>>> first saw it. Putting holes in the letters would kill the whole
>>> cleverness of it.
>> For the record, I agree with Sean -- this text has also been my
>> favorite part of the logo. It's a pun on top of a pun, really.
> I definitely agree here. The quotation marks as p d and g is an
> extremely clever feat of typography :)
> I'm not really that big of a fan of the bird logo. He doesn't look
> particularly pleased about life in general In fact, he looks rather
> out of it. I think it's important that if you have a character with a
> face, you should give him some sort of expression, in this case I'd go
> for happy.
I agree with Colin. The text is great, but bird really looks a bit to
serious. Chatting makes fun, so the logo should reflect that. Also, I
would say, a logo should be more simple, and not as detailed as the
current one. It's a nice piece of art, but I don't like it as logo.
How would you scale it down to use it as application icon (16x16px),
without getting a to blurry shape?
Actually, I don't know why Pidgin needs a new logo. Ok, the name has
changed, but the former Gaim logo wasn't either violating the AIM logo
(as far as I can see, if I compare them), nor was linked to the name
"Gaim". And, it still looks great! So, why not keep it?
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
More information about the Devel