Merging XMPP SoC branch
Richard Laager
rlaager at wiktel.com
Tue Jul 10 10:19:35 EDT 2007
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 12:42 +0200, Andreas Monitzer wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2007, at 01:28, Sean Egan wrote:
>
> > Is there objection to merging his code in early and letting him
> > continue to work in HEAD?
See below, plus the fact that Andreas is duplicating code that's in
trunk because he's not aware of propagate (or I'm seriously mistaken).
> Note that I probably won't get any feedback from anybody as long as
> this is hidden away in a branch.
I was under the impression that SoC projects had mentors.
(In case anyone is missing the sarcasm, I'm an SoC mentor.)
Then again, I was also under the impression that SoC projects couldn't
depend on each other to avoid situations like this.
I don't see why we have to take any action on this anyway... have Adium
track the branch until it's merge-ready. If it's merge ready now, then
why wasn't it merged rather than having a discussion about merging it
"early"?
Richard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://pidgin.im/pipermail/devel/attachments/20070710/cf1c2aad/attachment.sig>
More information about the Devel
mailing list