PHPurple 0.1.0 pre-alpha is released

[Anatoliy Belsky]

yeah, I'm only the one, who writes this binding ... and I have nothing agains 
GPL, quite the contrary. I don't making any closed source (please read my 
lisence text), I simply want to make the binding as easy of access as 
possible. hm .. i'm confused ... why if the bsd license is gpl compatible, i 
can't use it?

 
@Ka-Hing Cheung
I've already published things several times with GPL

On Sunday 02 March 2008 23:22, Kevin Stange wrote:
> Anatoliy Belsky wrote:
> > ok ... tell me please, what the more clause would satisfy all the
> > requirements I haven't included in my variant? ... hm ... please see it
> > so - if i'll get blocked with my thing ... hm .. it's the very end for me
> > with all the binding ever ... is this what one ever willing? ... but I
> > wanna also to be able to return the hours I've spended on
> >
> > ... hm ... I'm human ... this binding costs for me 4 month of my life
> > .......: if someone will tell me, the license is important and therefore
> > ... i can't compensate the development time ... my time ... ok ... i
> > can't .... hm ... ok ...  I've learned a lot ... but the opensource
> > comunity will lose a donative member ... definitely ... and I wan't this
> > ... please give me a chance .... what the sentence must into the license
> > ?
>
> If you are the only one that has written code for your project so, you
> can just change the license to the GPL (otherwise you should get
> permission from your contributors), which is the best thing you can
> possibly do and is simple, as long as you don't have objections to
> anything in the GPL.  Do you?
>
> Kevin