[Pidgin] #4986: automatic chat input field resizing should be optional, regression from 2.3
Pidgin
trac at pidgin.im
Tue Mar 4 22:50:33 EST 2008
#4986: automatic chat input field resizing should be optional, regression from 2.3
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: swbrown | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: pidgin (gtk) | Version: 2.4.0
Resolution: | Keywords: chat input resize
Pending: 0 |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by deryni):
Gookey:
"What if manual sizing is disabled when automatic sizing is enabled?" is
exactly what we have now and what people are complaining about, simply
allowing manual resizing again doesn't fix any of the problems people have
had with the auto-resizing code and that is something I can not accept.
The current code *needs* fixing, if after all that fixing it is still not
acceptable to some people adding the option (or writing a plugin, or some
other solution) can be considered.
I was unaware until earlier this afternoon that wrapped line spacing is
different than inter-paragraph spacing, and I fully admit that this
complicates the sizing more than I would like. I am still hopeful that
this can be worked around cleanly, but that will need to be tested,
guessing in either direction is not an answer.
If a person sets a percentage then they are indicating that should they
maximize the window they *want* the input area to grow to fill the same
percentage, if they don't want that they should use a number (we could
consider capping the percentage at some large number of lines but I think
that is just asking for confusion and annoyance). Given that ideally both
line counts and percentages would be allowable I think your argument here
doesn't really hold up.
Yes, I am aware that line counts and percentages are significantly less
immediately obvious than dragging a handle but I think the cost is worth
it.
2.3.x didn't handle window maximization at all, or if you want to call "by
expanding the chat area, and leaving the input area the same size"
handling it then the current 2.4.0 code handles it exactly the same way.
As would my suggestion with a minimum line count. So I don't really see
your argument here.
My suggestion alleviates the first two parts of your response to Sean
intrinsically and properly set up avoids the visual "jarring" in all but
the exceptional cases where you go over your self-defined line count.
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/4986#comment:76>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
More information about the Tracker
mailing list